procrastinating since 1970
(and/or 1971)
"People in the industry never expected EPA to go in that direction of a mercury trading program," said an industry lawyer. "It's something they liked, but [executives] thought the MACT standard was on the table, and they were resigned to that."I can already tell, 2004 is going to suck bigtime.
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by tj :: permalink ::
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by Dagwood :: permalink ::
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by Dagwood :: permalink ::
Tom Blanton, executive director of the National Security Archive, said: "Saddam had chemical weapons in the 1980's, and it didn't make any difference to U.S. policy."As for the Rumsfeld visit with Tariq Aziz in 1984:
Mr. Blanton suggested that the United States was now paying the price for earlier indulgence. "The embrace of Saddam in the 1980's and what it emboldened him to do should caution us as Americans that we have to look closely at all our murky alliances," he said. "Shaking hands with dictators today can turn them into Saddams tomorrow."
Mr. Shultz then turned to Mr. Rumsfeld. In a March 24 briefing document, Mr. Rumsfeld was asked to present America's bottom line. At first, the memo recapitulated Mr. Shultz's message to Mr. Kittani, saying it "clarified that our CW [chemical weapons] condemnation was made strictly out of our strong opposition to the use of lethal and incapacitating CW, wherever it occurs." The American officials had "emphasized that our interests in 1) preventing an Iranian victory and 2) continuing to improve bilateral relations with Iraq, at a pace of Iraq's choosing, remain undiminished," it said.So much for bilateral relations.
Then came the instructions for Mr. Rumsfeld: "This message bears reinforcing during your discussions."
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by tj :: permalink ::
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by Dagwood :: permalink ::
Top Ten Acts In The Billboard Top 25 That I've Never Heard Of
1. Ruben Studdard (1) - A complete mystery to me...Never heard of this guy, but apparently I should've since his album is number 1 on Billboard.
2. Alicia Keys (2) - Haven't heard of number 2 either. Am I out of touch or what?
3. Josh Groban (5) - Um...nope. Not ringing any bells over here. Maybe he's the lead singer of a band I've never heard of who's now doing a solo album...either way, I've never heard of this guy.
4. Hilary Duff (8) - I thought Hilary Duff was an actress...am I right about that? Someone let me know.
5. Clay Aiken (11) - Never heard of this guy either, but his name would suggest that he's a country artist which would explain why I've never heard of him. Incidentally, Toby Keith (who I have heard of) was in the top 5 which amazes me because he's a huge asshole.
6. Musiq (13) - Ok...two things about this act. Firstly, I've never heard of them. Secondly, that's got to be the silliest name I've ever seen.
7. Alan Jackson (15) - The weird thing about me not hearing of this guy is the fact that this album, which is ranked 15th on billboard, happens to be his Greatest Hits...which leads me to believe that he's been around for a couple of years at least. Oh well...I guess I'm not in his target market.
8. Westside Connection (16) - No sir. Never heard of this "Westside Connection". Oddly the record is on the Hoo-Bangin' record label which I think is a tremendously funny name for a label. It also leads me to believe that this act is a hip-hop act...am I right?
9. Avant (18) - This act has chosen a name which is the french word for "front". What is the significance of this? I don't know...I've never heard of them.
10. Big Tymers (21) - Best thing about these guys, aside from the fact that I've never heard of them, is the fact that they are on the "Cash Money" label. Tru Dat.
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by tj :: permalink ::
From March 4 to Nov. 27, 2002, one Adams County highway cleanup crew picked up 2,666 jugs of urine and 67 bags with human excrement in them.What? Why? Who is pissing in jugs and throwing them out the window? Why? Is this something they only do in Washington State? What the hell is going on up there?
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by Dagwood :: permalink ::
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by tj :: permalink ::
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by tj :: permalink ::
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by tj :: permalink ::
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by Dagwood :: permalink ::
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by tj :: permalink ::
With 130,000 of our troops in Iraq, only 600 - or 0.46 percent - were in the Baghdad mess hall to share the president's photo-op with the turkey platter. This means that 99.54 percent - or 129,400 - of our men and women at war had no clue of the president's "support for our troops."
So, who really benefited from this boondoggle:
1. The 600 in Baghdad with the turkey photo-op;
2. The 129,400 going about their daily duty; or
3. The 2004 presidential campaign?
BILL WIELAND
Heeney
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by Dagwood :: permalink ::
Since when is Paul Wolfowitz in charge of diplomatic relations? Unfortunately, since yesterday. In an unprecedented "I'm going home and taking my ball with me" move, Wolfy excluded French, German and Russian companies from participating in the lucrative Iraq rebuilding contracts to the tune of $18.6 billion.
A State Department official said Tuesday night that "we are committed to putting the past behind us" in relations with countries that opposed the war.Hmmm...putting the past behind us indeed. Sounds like double talk to me. Of course, Wolfy's own words provide a perfect example of speaking from both sides of one's mouth.
But, the official added, "This is taxpayers' money, and so we have got to go with those who have pitched in already."
"Every effort must be made to expand international cooperation in Iraq," he wrote, adding: "Limiting competition for prime contracts will encourage the expansion of international cooperation in Iraq and in future efforts."Ok...I agree with the premise: expand international cooperation but, does that second part make sense to anyone? How does limiting competition encourage the expansion of international cooperation? Frankly, it doesn't.
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by tj :: permalink ::
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by tj :: permalink ::
Mr. Lieberman's pollster, Mark Penn, who worked for Mr. Gore in 2000, said he did not think Mr. Gore's endorsement would make much of a difference: "Voters generally don't like to be told who to vote for by former presidential candidates.""Waah, waah, waah," he added.
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by tj :: permalink ::
The U.S. has ended "major combat activity" in Afghanistan, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld announced last week, adding "we clearly have moved from major combat activity to a period of stability and stabilization and reconstruction activities."This was clearly a lie as evidenced by this NY Times article from...oh...it's from today, which is approximately 7 months after the Time article.
Seven boys and two girls died here on Saturday morning in an American airstrike, and their bodies were still lying in the dust when American soldiers arrived by helicopter to assess the results of the attack three hours laterNow, that doesn't sound like the end of major combat to me unless you consider killing schoolchildren to be something other than major combat. Hey, wait a minute...killing schoolchildren is something other than major combat...it's fucking murder!
Maybe Rummy was right in the first place. my bad.
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by tj :: permalink ::
White House officials do not deny that they craft elaborate events to showcase Bush, but they maintain that these events are designed to accurately dramatize his policies and to convey qualities about him that are real.
"This was effective, because it captured something about the president that people know is true, that he really cares about the soldiers and gets emotional when he sees them," Mary Matalin, a former administration official, said about the trip to Baghdad. "You have to figure out how to capture the Bush we know, even if it doesn't come through in a speech situation or a press conference. He regularly rejects anything that is not him."


:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by Dagwood :: permalink ::
U.S. companies added 57,000 new jobs in November, boosting payrolls by 328,000 during the past four months following a half-year hiring drought. However, analysts had predicted that about 150,000 new jobs would be added in November.Ouch. That's not even close. And while the Bush Administration claims that the tax cuts are spurring companies to hire new employees, the real impact can be seen in this article about the disappointing retail sales.
Economists are looking for monthly payroll gains of 200,000 to 300,000 to significantly lower the unemployment rate and sustain a labor market recovery.
Over all, luxury goods stores continued to rally. Analysts said that President Bush's tax cuts, a strengthening stock market and improving job security, as well as pent-up demand, drove affluent shoppers into stores like Saks Fifth Avenue, where $1,000 watches with diamond-studded bezels and green crocodile bands were big sellers.
Most stores, however, are no longer benefiting from the tax cuts or from the extra cash that many homeowners had after a wave of mortgage refinancings earlier in the year, Mr. Perkins of Thomson First Call said. "The benefits of the tax refunds are drying up," he said, "and the re-fi wave is ebbing."
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by tj :: permalink ::
...the US has never explained case by case why it locked them up, the outside world has only the accounts of their families and the catch-all US definition of "enemy combatant" to understand who they are and why they are there.Maybe they're being held indefinitely for illegally brining the bird.
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by tj :: permalink ::
![]() | Here it is, this weeks edition of the Weekly Santorum. It's largely based on this Washington Post article, but I ad lib a bit as well. |
Hey there Ricky!
so nice to speak to you again. You never responded to my first email...I hope everything's all right.
I noticed that you're tooting your own horn on the Medicare legislation. Good job, buddy. I also couldn't help noticing the $125 Billion in corporate welfare that's in that bill. I guess the prescription drug benefit is nice...but didn't we already have another bill for that? I mean, seriously, with the deficit where it is right now do we really need to be giving corporations more tax breaks on stuff they're already doing? It's not like we're incentivizing anyone?
Ahhh...but i digress.
One other thing, I read your press release and noticed this quote:
"This is a historic opportunity to bring Medicare more into line with 21st century medicine..."
technically, it's *an* historic opportunity...er...maybe not.
write back soon!
miss you!
TJ
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by tj :: permalink ::
...that victory in the conflict we're in Iraq now matters as much to them in the civilized world as it does to the United States of America.and then there's this one quoted from none other than Fox News Sunday:
This is a battle to stop al Qaeda, Saddam Hussein and every other enemy of freedom and modernity from turning the beginning of the 21st century into what is truly unbelievable, which would be a global religious war.and then of course, there's this one:
Iraq is the testing ground, and that's why we've got to make sure that victory is assured.So, Joe...the war in Iraq was actually about defending our religious beliefs? You mean it's not about oil and ensuring that America remains the only super power?
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by tj :: permalink ::
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by Dagwood :: permalink ::
:::::::::::::::::::::: posted by tj :: permalink ::
That is all.